I knew a few people in seminary who enrolled in certain classes just so they could argue. I’m not entirely sure whether they were there to learn or take perverse pleasure in vocally disagreeing with their professors over various points of theology. In any case, they would share the stories of their “battles” proudly, as if they had achieved some great victory over the forces of darkness.
Unlikely. More probably they just annoyed their professors and classmates both. I have little patience for this kind of approach to education, theology, and/or the Christian life, and don’t appreciate the self-inflicted wounds of an intentional martyr. Arguing about minutiae and picking fights is not in the best interests of the Church. Being contrary without good cause is, well, dumb.
This brings me to Jesusween:
JesusWeen is a non profit organization also known as JesusWin. We are focused on helping people live better lives through the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. JesusWeen is a God-given vision which was born as an answer to the cry of many every October 31st. The dictionary meaning of Ween is to expect, believe or think. We therefore see October 31st as a day to expect a gift of salvation and re-think receiving Jesus.
Every year, the world and its system have a day set aside (October 31st) to celebrate ungodly images and evil characters while Christians all over the world participate, hide or just stay quiet on Halloween day. Being a day that is widely acceptable to solicit and knock on doors, God inspired us to encourage Christians to use this day as an opportunity to spread the gospel. The days of hiding are over and we choose to take a stand for Jesus. “Evil prevails when good people do nothing”. JesusWeen is expected to become the most effective Christian outreach day ever and that is why we also call it” World Evangelism Day”.
Now, I have nothing against evangelism. I am a proud Pentecostal and consider it God’s call on our lives to be ready to share His love and salvation. In some sense I understand and have sympathy with the ideals of Jesusween.
But really? On Halloween? The non-Christian world already thinks that we hate them in the name of God, and now we’re tacitly attacking a day when their little kids get dressed up and visit their community while neighbors share candy and laughs. To be sure, there are undeniable pagan origins to the holiday, but the same could be said of Easter or Christmas. While some choose to use the day as an excuse to disgust or titillate, for many children and families it is a happy one. Attacking it is at least as bad as signing up for a course just to argue with the professor. If we make the effort to judge the holiday so harshly and publicly it will indeed be much worse.
In the words of the “Jesusween” website, “Christians all over the world participate, hide or just stay quiet on Halloween day.” Hide? Really? For spiritual reasons, or are they just too cheap to give out candy? (that’s my excuse, but I think Jesusween is causing me to reconsider).
Friends, I think we’re picking a fight where none ought to exist. If Christmas and Easter can be co-opted and corrupted by secular and consumer culture, this day can be co-opted for God. Halloween is a pagan holiday, yes. But it can be redeemed…not by turning it into a bold and brassy Jehovah’s Witness style evangelism invasion, but by showing love to our neighbors and participating in one of the few community events available in our suburban individualism. So fill that bowl with candy, not tracts. Dress up like a princess or a cowboy. Go out there and be in the world to which Christ has called you. Do so as a Christian men and women, but not as pushy salesmen who couldn’t have picked a worse evening.
And please…let’s just all calm down and call it HALLOWEEN. That’s its name–not some ridiculous made up half-name that will likely serve to bring only reproach and ridicule on the name of Christ.
Some of the catalyst for our current situation was the G. I. Bill passed in the wake of the Second World War. Intended to provide funding for college education and training for our servicemen returning from overseas, it allowed many to have access to higher education that would have otherwise been denied to them. Not too shabby. The ranks of the college-educated grew and the world of higher education naturally expanded. As these newly educated individuals entered the work force, employers became used to more education, and the requirements for such jobs were adjusted.
A lot of other developments enter into all of this, including the expansion of the economy in the 1950s and the desire for the American educational system to become more robust in the face of challenges from the Soviets. The Baby Boom didn’t help matters, either.
As more education was available, employers could be more demanding in who they hired, meaning that more people needed to get more education for the same jobs. The process continued, further enshrining the “BA” as the new hallmark of success. We are now well on our way to the Masters degree holding the same place. The cost of these educational demands are catching up…with a vengeance.
In light of these realities, I see at least two-and-a-half possible futures:
1. The government steps in–much more than it has already. The kind of action needed would be far beyond simply offering more advantageous loan rates. It would have to be a systemic revision of the entire higher education world. Something more akin to the European model, I suspect. All worthy candidates for “university” would have their education paid for or heavily subsidized. The upside would be that Americans would now have equal access to education and be able to do so without the staggering load of debt many carry. The downside would, of course, be a corresponding increase in taxes and the potential institution of complex entrance or vocational exams to determine eligibility for what students study. Many would see that as both socialist and undemocratic. Further, it would likely do little to alleviate the dilution of higher education and demands from employers to have ever-more-advanced degrees.
2. The government does nothing and the cold hand of the market takes over. In this model, college costs very quickly become so expensive that greater and greater numbers of people simply decide not to go. In the short run, this is highly advantageous to those who can afford higher education. Those who can’t will be left to take whatever jobs remain available to them. Over time, however, employers will begin to notice that there are fewer and fewer “qualified” people available to fill their needs, and will likely lower educational requirements for various occupations. Eventually this may return us to a pre-WWII balance of education and employment. The upside to this is that in the long-run, things may even out and balance themselves. No more loads of debt or an unsustainable educational behemoth churning out increasingly empty degrees. The downside is that the short run will be horrible for many. Moreover, this will lead to the closure of many institutions of higher learning and the progressive growth of educational elitism. Knowledge will be concentrated in the hands of the few, and in a developing and technologically advancing world, this may leave the United States in a bit of a lurch.
2a. More and more students do what they do now: attend community college before transferring to a traditional undergraduate institution and taking as many online courses as possible. Over time, the rapidly expanding system of online education will chip away at the vast number of residential schools in the United States, leaving behind only those who have the most to offer at the most reasonable price or can adapt into become little “Universities of Phoenix.” Residential four-year colleges will be the option of the few. Online education for the many will expand to a point that one’s entire degree can be earned from home. The advantages to this model include convenience and thrift. The disadvantages include the virtual destruction of the residential system of education. All of the advantages of life in community and mutual learning will slowly fade–an alarming development in what can already be seen as a rather individualistic culture. Further, professorial tenure has the potential to become a thing of the past, with PhD-earners becoming educational “guns-for-hire,” paid piecemeal for each online course they teach.
This represents only a thumbnail sketch of my thoughts on these matters. There are no doubt many more directions to take this discussion. What do you say?
College. Higher education. That thing you’re apparently supposed to do after graduating high school. It has been my life these past 13 years, and by all indications will be so for the remainder of my days. So, as you can imagine, I am rather concerned about its future.
Whether or not it was a compassionate move or a bold play for sympathy and votes, President Obama’s recent announcement about adjusting student loan repayment rules underlines an important reality. College is expensive…and it will not be getting cheaper any time soon. The average graduate of a four-year institution now owes nearly $25,000 in student loans. College costs continue to increase, outpacing inflation and general cost of living expenses. What this leaves us with is trouble.
What has caused all of this? I don’t know, entirely. But I do know that more people continue their education past high school than ever before. For many students, it is simply assumed that college is the next step. The problems with this are legion, and have had a ripple effect in American society.
1. Students feel compelled to go to college, even if they have no idea what they want to do or whether they belong in college in the first place. Not to mention that most high school seniors have little conception of the amounts of money they will have to borrow to accomplish their goal.
2. More and more occupations are now requiring advanced degrees for jobs that did not require such high levels of education before. This means more money must be spent to be qualified/trained for the same jobs.
3. The vast assembly line that is higher education must churn out more and more degrees. The effect is, I suspect, diluting the value and integrity of such degrees. Does the BA of today represent the same academic vigor of the BA of fifty years ago? I fear it does not.
4. The hegemony of the “college educated” has the potential to create an unhealthy societal division between those who have gone to college and those who have not. This works both ways, however: not going to college and accumulating massive amounts debt means that those entering and apprenticing in the trades may actually end up better financially that their lettered peers.
5. As noted above, the accumulation of vast amounts of debt continues to accelerate, moreso than even federal loans with relatively gentle terms can accommodate. Parents and students themselves are forced to turn to private lenders with interest rates and repayment terms that can approach the predatory. After graduation, even students that find reasonably well-paying jobs are saddled with monthly payments that preclude hopes of buying a first home or approaching anything near comfortable self-sufficiency.
Is a college education worth it? I think so, but not for everyone. If things continue they way they have been, I suspect it will be worth it for fewer and fewer in years to come.
There are ways out of this wilderness, and tomorrow I’ll propose two likely options. One for the classical liberals who favor the free hand of the market, and the other for those in favor of a more interventionist government. Until then, your thoughts?
Many of us have heard about President Obama’s new plan to help graduated college students with the staggering load of college debt they tend to carry. The income-based repayment options the government now offers-and will soon expand-will definitely make a dent in things. It has the potential to reduce minimum payments from hundreds of dollars per month to much, much less. But then, of course, this only applies to federal loans…not all those pesky private loans your financial aid officer talked you into.
Recently, however, I’ve become aware of a plan passed by the Congress back in 2007 that involves total loan FORGIVENESS after ten years of consistent payments. Two catches: 1) you must work in the public sector or for a non-profit 501(c3) organization, and 2) this will only apply to federal-based loans. But, if I’m understanding matters correctly, this can be linked with the income-based repayment plan, meaning that a person could theoretically have their loan payments reduced substantially and only make 120 of these diminished payments before they go away entirely. I’ve heard of some having success with this program, and would encourage anyone saddled with more than they can pay to look into it.
Seems too good to be true? I know. It does. But you don’t have to take my word for it: check out the facts from the federal government itself, and Google away. Tomorrow: some thoughts on where higher education is going…
In a little over an hour, I head to the Northwest University chapel to speak to our student body for the first time. The powers that be have assigned me a text from the gospel of John, so the topics upon which I can speak have been somewhat circumscribed. After looking through the passage, I’ve decided to echo the words of Jesus and just tell everyone to stop sinning.
At a certain level that sounds a bit harsh and judgmental, but then I suppose it does lie within the best traditions of Scripture and the history of the Church. It is hard to spend much time studying either without realizing how pervasive sin is. Individually and corporately, we human beings are good at it. We destroy ourselves, each other, and our world.
It will be interesting to see how, or if, the community responds. For though I certainly include myself amongst that number that needs to stop sinning, no one likes to be told they do.
I’m a big fan of science fiction. I embrace this truth. Wholeheartedly.
This means it is finally time to ask a question I’ve been asking myself for years: why do the Borg sound the same as church congregations during corporate prayer/Scripture reading/liturgies? Was this an intentional move on the part of those hostile Star Trek people? It definite comes off as a critique of something about modern society. Globalization seems as good a choice as any…after all, resisting McDonald’s and Walmart is futile…
A good answer for a good question. But what is the chief end of God? What does God want from us? What does God really want?
I thought about this today as I met with some of our ministry interns here at Northwest University. We were discussing Mark Yaconelli’s book Contemplative Youth Ministry, and conversation turned to the unrealistic and unhealthy expectations ministers place upon themselves. Evaluating success in earthly terms rather than divine ones, and the captivity that can bring.
We need to start at the basics, with this question. Only then, I think does the rest of it start to fit together.
So, then….what does God want? Does God want us to be good? Nice? Prophetic? Conservative? Liberal? Rejecting of all labels?
Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s popularity has boomed in recent years. In all corners, he is seen as a heroic figure and/or theological innovator from whom we in the modern Church have much to learn. His death at the age of 39 robbed the 20th century of one of its great theologians, yet also enshrined him as a hero for individuals from widely disparate points on the theological spectrum. “Religionless Christianity?” Check. Attempting to murder Hitler? Check. Standing with the Church against the corruption of its doctrine or co-option by the State? Check. So on and so forth.
Today, I reflect on his hallmark idea: grace. He says it best:
“Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, (it is) baptism without church discipline, Communion without confession, absolution without personal confession. Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate…Such grace is costly because it calls us to follow, and it is grace because it calls us to follow Jesus Christ. It is costly because it costs a man his life, and it is grace because it gives a man the only true life. It is costly because it condemns sin, and grace because it justifies the sinner. Above all, it is costly because it cost God the life of his Son: “ye were bought at a price,” and what has cost God much cannot be cheap for us. Above all, it is grace because God did not reckon his Son too dear a price to pay for our life, but delivered him up for us.”