0,,4314055_4,00Today I’m continuing my ongoing series on the Amendments to the United States Constitution.  While certainly not my most popular set of posts, it has been helpful and interesting for me as an historian and citizen to walk through each of them over the past number of months.

Today we turn our attention to the Twentieth Amendment, which reads (in part) as follows:

The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3rd day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.

Hidden in this brief discussion of dates was an important oathchange in the way the government operated.  Previous to the passage of this amendment, incoming Presidents (and Congresses) who had been elected in one year would not be seated until 4 March of the next year; the new Congress itself would not be required to meet until the following December.  For Presidents this meant a mandatory four-month waiting period between election and inauguration.  For Congress this could mean up to thirteen months of inaction.

During the early days of the Republic and in unremarkable times, such delays–though annoying–were not that troubling.  In moments of crisis, however, they could be near catastrophic.  In 1860, Lincoln’s November election occasioned the beginning of the South’s secession.  Unfortunately, he had no power to do anything about it until 4 March of the next year.  Not very convenient.  During the Great Depression our nation was in a great_depression-2different but no less severe crisis, and it was in the midst of this historical moment that the Twentieth Amendment was passed.  After 1933, new Presidents and Congresses would not have to wait what seemed to be an inordinate amount of time before addressing the nation’s problems.

While I believe that a certain transition period is helpful between administrations, is it possible that–in the spirit of the Twentieth Amendment–there should now be even less time between incoming and outgoing administrations?  In our fast-paced world, this might be something to consider.  A lame duck is still a lame duck, no matter how short the time…and Presidents-elect without any power are not very presidential at all.


2 comments on “Quack

  1. wcosnett says:

    My only thought is about how much transition time is needed between administrations and how much time that process could realistically be shortened. I would also say that my understanding of a “lame duck” president in that are lame mainly in their ability to influence policy and their agenda, and so they still have the powers of their office. If we were attacked on January 5th I don’t think the president would have any resistance as they used their authority. I appreciate your sentiment and I agree with it, but when I started thinking of everything that must go into an administration changeover (with the federal Holidays of Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Years in there), I become less sure as to the feasibility of such a move.

    • Will: Good points here. I’m not sure how much, if at all, it could be shortened. Regarding the other issue, the question would be, what if the electorate wholly rejected the former President or wholeheartedly endorsed the new President as a course correction, and the old one was unwilling to change anything during their “lame duck” period. I’m thinking here of the period before Lincoln’s inauguration and the Hoover/Roosevelt changeover.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s